jessicageorge.org is down until i can re-new the domain. digital camera has mal-functions due to me leaving it out in the rain. painting is slowly progressing due to summer start and city callings.
here’s a quick view of some norita newness. B&W film — is easy to develop at home and in town now! — scans are easy to show and can emerge even when expired.
Listening to “Someone Else’s Song” makes me want to sing and write a melody. It makes me want to author something similarly enjoyable, but sprung from my own well. Of late, in viewing my work, questions of my authorship have arisen. Sometimes i by-pass or give away authorship to encompass ideas other than my own or to shine light on things that hold my attention. These are things that are not birthed by me, rather stumbled across due to what one might consider good timing and looking. Perhaps, i imagine i have good timing and really i should focus on my own beat, but how hard it is to ignore the rhythms being made — by others — all around!
As i catch myself thinking about these things, imagining my good fortune to be actual and the random beauty i encounter to be real, i begin to wonder how and why i need to differentiate between something that is an influence and something that is “purely” my creation. To separate the question of authorship into my own and others — outside and inside — seems very clear and very opaque at the same time. Yes, my hands made this, i was looking at something outside of myself, but it filtered through my insides. Yes, my hands made this, i was thinking about something inside, and this is how i chose to mediate that thought.
Getting caught thinking like this, evaluating whether something impacted my results or whether i alone impacted my results makes me cringe. How impossible it is to claim that I ALONE DID THIS. We all aspire to be self reliant and DIY is all the rage, but we never can really get the whole process to be made by our hands alone. Someone else makes our materials, something/one else delivers insight, light shines to present things we never saw before, we are not islands and homogeneous authenticity seems to be a dream.
My attempts to be authentic, to put something of myself out there is questionable, although it is what i am constantly striving to do. What i mean by questionable is that how can ever one really produce something without questioning where it came from? I find things inside i want to hide, and i filter parts of me i want to use out to a distilled form. By no means am i censoring myself, but i am totally watching what comes out closely and removing parts that i don’t want to show.
I find most things inside are constantly touched by whats happening outside of me. I try to claim authenticity and end up whispering uncertainly; does the water not get credit? the light? the atmosphere of where i stood, the direction i looked, the rocks? the people i was with? When is it JUST me? I think about someone like Forrest Bess and how he did not feel responsible for his work, how he felt he was simply a conduit. He painted “ideograms” — visions he saw on the inside of his eyelids — and lived a solitary existence painting on an island off of Texas as a “visionary”, a supposed translator of his unconscious. This kind of artist intrigues me as sometimes i believe i can or i want to create images similarly, but i don’t see things on the inside of my eyelids. Things are too puzzling for me for that type of painting and i question what i remember and what i have seen too much. I feel responsible to what i have witnessed. I may evaluate inaccurately, forget important details or become adamant about inconsequential parts, but I don’t lie, and i do believe new significance is created simply by admission of a view.
Opening up my practice into larger spaces (coming from the smallness of a home, a studio, an island) and trying to retain that smallness is the motivator to expand. Not being able to disentangle things is native to tight spaces. This is how it feels inside me when i think about where what i make comes from — uptight. Surely this is not an individual feeling, getting right back to being in-authentic. We are constantly doing battle with our small spaces and trying to let loose. It’s in attempt to manage these interior spaces and carry on without dragging that i make things, i paint, i take a picture, i look around me, i let something out, or let something in that will loosen me up.
Last week i was fearful and fretting about how i might keep dragging, how i might not be able to pick it up. However, there’s nothing like a good quick phone conversation driving north in the car with an old friend to have them remind me, “Yeah, but you work well under pressure. You’re funny in tight spots” I replied that I’m unpredictable, i mean I don’t even know what i’m going to do next. The simple confidence of a friend, a nudge from the outside, was a calming and helpful affect on my insides. Thank You Mary Anne. How can I not be moved?
I still don’t know if its better to just live with it or get over it, but in the best interest of newer objects of affection, one might consider getting over it. Also consider what utopias may be other than fantastical unsustainable ideals. Are they highly designed escapes?
Read again:
“Nostalgia is a sadness without an object, a sadness which creates a longing that of necessity is inauthentic because it does not take part in lived experience. Rather, it remains behind and before that experience. Nostalgia, like any form of narrative, is always ideological: the past it seeks has never existed except as narrative, and hence, always absent, that past continually threatens to reproduce itself as a felt lack. Hostile to history and its invisible origins, and yet longing for an impossibly pure context of lived experience at a place of origin, nostalgia wears a distinctly utopian face, a face that turns toward a future-past, a past which has only ideological reality. This point of desire which the nostalgic seeks is in fact the absence that is the very generating mechanism of desire. As we shall see in our discussion of the souvenir, the realization of re-union imagined by the nostalgic is a narrative utopia that works only by virtue of its partiality, its lack of fixity and closure: nostalgia is the desire for desire.
The prevailing motif of nostalgia is the erasure of the gap between nature and culture, and hence a return to the utopia of biology and symbol united within the walled city of the maternal. The nostalgic’s utopia is prelapsarian, a genesis where lived and mediated experience are one, where authenticity and transcendence are both present and everywhere. The crisis of the sign, emerging between signifier and signified, between the material nature of the former and the abstract and historical nature of the latter, as well as within the mediated reality between written and spoken language, is denied by the nostalgic’s utopia, a utopia where authenticity suffuses both word and world. The nostalgic dreams of a moment before knowledge and self consciousness that itself lives on only in the self-consciousness of the nostalgic narrative. Nostalgia is the repetition that mourns the inauthenticity of all repetition and denies the repetition’s capacity to form identity. Thus we find that the disjunctions of temporality traced here create the space for nostalgia’s eruption. The inability of the sign to “capture” its signified, of narrative to be one with tits object, and of the genres of mechanical reproduction to approximate the time of face-to-face communication leads to a generalized desire for origin, for nature, and for unmediated experience that is at work in nostalgic longing. Memory, at once impoverished and enriched, presents itself as a device for measurement, the “ruler” of narrative. Thus near-sightedness and far-sightedness emerge as metaphors for understanding, and they will be of increasing importance as this essay proceeds.” p.23-24 Susan Stewart – On Longing
I begin to make something with the part of me that wants to move out (side) and around. In the end — when i stop the thing from changing by removing my will — i hope to be content with its (dis)order.
What is exposed, what is made, is eventually detached from my hopes in (dis)order to becomes itself. It is no longer a part of me, it is a part of the world. It talks for itself, saying things i could never think it would say, louder than i dreamt it might say them.
Meanwhile, i analyze what has come a part — and before — from me. I attempt to understand what i have uncovered — what is being illuminated — through re-playing and re-shaping the matters at hand. Sometimes i come to an understanding and other times i have to tear myself away from a tendency to fall off into an infinite hyper-critical abyss.
I remember a present a friend gave me for my 26th birthday. A message scribbled on a small piece of paper wrapped around a match and placed in a tiny bottle labeled “Love is a feeling like a warm black stone.” The message says: “Why are we bent on measurement? Why do we measure and how? Is yours a milimeter longer? Oh, wow.”
Reading this i am still at the beginning of forming answers to these questions. The only thing i know for sure is that the tone in which i imagine, “Is yours a milimeter longer? Oh, wow” to be read in is somewhat cavalier. How i might begin to answer this friendly and beautifully packaged birthday question is to comment that (currently) I wear a size 6 in GAP jeans, a size 4 in Banana Republic, and can squeeze myself into a pair of 28 Sevens. Very meaningful stuff.
Measurement is for fitting in. I am all for being in and out and together and apart already. How this came about, i don’t know, there’s probably some documentation around, but — things disappear — maybe I just don’t want those parts to be seen. Anyway, what’s the matter with hanging out, re-generating everything, and dieing to bring perspective to re-forming standards of measurement?
Jessica Townes George Griffin couldn’t find typical landmark references. Now has changed over infiltrating tactics to use an open playing field for direct access to desired destination. Nothing heavy. Must get job done. More cocktails?! I love you(in sign language). NOTHING HEAvY.